## Why
The contract review team now uses the merged `clause-extractor` 1.1.0
bounded checkpoint workflow. The official market entry still pointed at
team release 0.1.26 and clause-extractor 1.0.6.
## Change
- Publish team version 0.1.27.
- Point the source ref to merged team commit
`cb25d73a0dfbfc319df6eac2d254b3dbcc790e6e`.
- Update the member projection to clause-extractor 1.1.0.
Ordinary tender review was blocked by mandatory TaskSpec preparation,
metadata preflight, fixed report packages and runtime receipts, while
the business quality of delivered opinions remained insufficiently
explicit.
This release accepts clear natural-language assignments and defines
concrete goals, good and bad outcomes, evidence expectations and focused
corrections for each role. Chat, tables and files are valid
deliverables. Specialist calculations and legacy structured-export
validators remain available for their specific purposes. It removes
obsolete business input contracts and updates the corresponding
bilingual guides.
Validation was performed after the full multi-repository modification:
JSON/configuration and document-link checks, targeted calculation
regressions, independent content review, and eight synthetic
paper-evaluation scenarios (8/8 after fixing informational-only entry
handling and residual visual preflight/human gates). Paper evaluation is
not a live DesireCore/Qwen or real-tender accuracy result. No real bid
package was tested.
---------
Co-authored-by: yige <yige@yigedeMacBook-Neo.local>
Advance the team source pointer and matching catalog provenance/review
reference to the merged bilingual project-guide commit.
Co-authored-by: yige <yige@yigedeMacBook-Neo.local>
Update the published team pointer to the reviewed team revision that
locks Lead and Evidence 0.1.1. Preview wording remains until
clean-install end-to-end acceptance is complete.
Co-authored-by: yige <yige@yigedeMacBook-Neo.local>
## What this changes
Adds the tender-review team and its onboarding entry to the official
Market catalog as an immutable source pointer, plus bilingual catalog
sidecars.
- `teams/biao-shu-lian-he-shen-cha/entry.json` points to the published
team commit `7ee5650b066cdee385288a722b8cbd8e1947d0fe`.
- `agents/tender-review-assistant/entry.json` points to assistant commit
`4b6855d2edb535f81c29847e06145c0da87942d0`.
- Both entries include bilingual descriptions, privacy boundaries and
`requiredClientVersion: 10.0.155`.
- The listing is deliberately `pointer` / preview. It does not claim the
v10.0.155 release is fully green or production-certified; newcomer
qualification remains pending.
## Validation
- `python3 scripts/catalog/validate_catalog_metadata.py --json` — 0
errors (existing catalog warnings unchanged).
- Market entry and both `catalog-metadata.v1.json` sidecars validate
against the current client/catalog schemas.
- Published source repositories and full commit pins were checked before
creating this branch.
---------
Co-authored-by: yige <yige@yigedeMacBook-Neo.local>
## Why
The C02 newcomer test exposed a missing-material preflight defect in the
contract-review lead. The corrected team release is already merged as
0.1.24; this PR publishes the exact team ref to the market.
## What changed
- Update the market pointer and catalog sidecar to contract-review-team
0.1.24.
- Pin both metadata surfaces to
`e096a74a482b55266753b3b93e179f9cac2f0ecd`.
- Publish contract-review-lead 1.0.12 in the team roster.
## Validation
- Parsed both market JSON files.
- Verified pointer, provenance, and reviewed refs are identical.
- Verified the remote team `main` ref matches the published pointer.
- Ran the catalog and i18n validators successfully; they reported only
pre-existing catalog warnings outside this team.
- Ran `git diff --check`.
## 中文说明
将市场中的合同审查团队发布指针升级到 0.1.24，并锁定已合并的团队提交。该版本包含统筹官 1.0.12
的无材料零工具咨询修复；entry、sidecar 的来源与审阅提交已一致，市场校验通过。
## Why
Publish the reviewed contract review team fix that was validated by a
fresh final18 real run. The prior run correctly fail-closed when
reporter artifacts escaped the lead case root and clauses.yaml was not
parseable.
## Changes
- bump marketplace entry/catalog to team 0.1.18
- point source/provenance/governance refs to merged team commit
6aa93bf11a6e37cc9d0444e3335ba953bee0a61f
- expose lead 1.0.10, clause 1.0.5, reporter 1.0.4 member versions
- retain legal disclaimer and source-pointer-only distribution
## Validation
- catalog validator exit 0
- i18n validator exit 0
- targeted JSON/ref assertions
- git diff --check
Publish Contract Review Team 0.1.12. Update entry/catalog to the merged
team ref d85b9244244c3b69718b2525b8ef4b8b7296f144, lead 1.0.8, and
current timestamps. Focused validators: metadata 47 passed, i18n 19
passed, collection 4 passed, JSON parse and diff-check pass; existing
catalog warnings unchanged.
## Why / 背景
The market entry still pointed at team v0.1.5. Its pinned member lock
used stale agent manifests whose `command_authority.allowed_targets` did
not match the installed runtime IDs, so a fresh newcomer install could
pass catalog discovery but block the first delegation. The upstream team
main is now v0.1.6 with the corrected lock and member versions.
市场条目仍指向 v0.1.5。其成员锁引用了旧 Agent
manifest，`command_authority.allowed_targets` 与安装后的 runtime ID
不一致，导致新人实例虽然能发现团队，却会在首次委派时被阻断。上游团队 main 已更新到 v0.1.6，成员锁和版本已修正。
## What changed / 变更
- bump `latestVersion` and `release.version` to `0.1.6`;
- point entry source, catalog provenance, and compliance `reviewedRef`
to upstream team commit `3a4736e31ff5bf4299fde17fdde682a179d898b2`;
- align all six listed member versions with the upstream
`members.lock.json` (lead 1.0.4, intake 1.0.1, clause 1.0.2, risk 1.0.2,
jurisdiction 1.2.1, reporter 1.0.1);
- update release and upstream observation timestamps.
- 将 `latestVersion` 与 `release.version` 更新为 `0.1.6`；
- 将 entry source、catalog provenance 和 compliance `reviewedRef` 对齐上游团队
commit `3a4736e31ff5bf4299fde17fdde682a179d898b2`；
- 六名成员版本与上游 `members.lock.json` 对齐（统筹 1.0.4、输入 1.0.1、条款 1.0.2、风险
1.0.2、法域 1.2.1、报告 1.0.1）；
- 更新发布时间与上游观察时间。
## Validation / 验证
- `uv run scripts/catalog/validate_catalog_metadata.py --json` — exit 0,
0 errors, 129 existing warnings;
- `uv run scripts/i18n/validate-i18n.py` — exit 0;
- `uv run scripts/catalog/test_validate_catalog_metadata.py` — 47
passed;
- `uv run scripts/i18n/test_validate_i18n.py` — 19 passed;
- `uv run scripts/catalog/test_collection_generator.py` — 4 passed;
- independent GPT-Reserve reviews — PASS, P0/P1/P2/P3=0;
- `git diff --check` — passed.
- `uv run scripts/catalog/validate_catalog_metadata.py --json`：exit 0，0
errors，129 个既有 warnings；
- `uv run scripts/i18n/validate-i18n.py`：exit 0；
- `uv run scripts/catalog/test_validate_catalog_metadata.py`：47 passed；
- `uv run scripts/i18n/test_validate_i18n.py`：19 passed；
- `uv run scripts/catalog/test_collection_generator.py`：4 passed；
- 两次独立 GPT-Reserve 复审：PASS，P0/P1/P2/P3=0；
- `git diff --check`：通过。
## Changes\n- publish contract-review-team v0.1.5\n- point entry and
catalog metadata at merged team main commit
2a45d9fc031ba7d63d3ec15552ef0bc4c3a2b46e\n- align clause-extractor
roster version to 1.0.2\n- advance release timestamps to
2026-09-06T10:02:16Z, after team lock resolvedAt
2026-09-06T09:56:11.162Z\n- preserve Work Context description and all
unrelated metadata\n\n## Validation\n- team entry schema: PASS\n-
catalog metadata validator: PASS (existing repository warnings only)\n-
i18n validator: PASS (0 errors, 129 existing warnings)\n- collection
generator tests: 4 passed\n- git diff --check: PASS\n\nPlease review
independently; do not merge automatically.
Publish team 0.1.4 with the merged lead manifest version/hash lock. Independent GPT-Reserve review PASS; Copilot approval recommended; market validators/tests PASS.
Publish contract review team 0.1.3 with Work Context orchestration compatibility and aligned publication provenance timestamps. Independent GPT-Reserve review PASS; market validators and tests PASS; Copilot concern resolved with timestamp fix.
Align the market roster jurisdiction-auditor version with the published
team lock. Independent GPT-Reserve review passed; canonical market
validators and tests pass.
Publish contract review team 0.1.2 with runtime Agent IDs in command
authority and update the catalog metadata to the merged team lock
commit. Independent GPT-Reserve review passed; canonical market
validators report 0 errors.
## Why / 背景
The pinned team release `73cd87a9901cc548871927e9d5dbec8e4cc6c2b1`
contains `jurisdiction-auditor` version `1.0.0`, but the merged market
entry advertised `1.2.0`. That metadata mismatch makes a valid pinned
release fail exact roster validation during newcomer installation.
团队发布锁 `73cd87a9901cc548871927e9d5dbec8e4cc6c2b1` 中的
`jurisdiction-auditor` 实际版本为 `1.0.0`，已合并的市场条目却写成
`1.2.0`。该元数据不一致会让新人安装时的精确 roster 校验拒绝有效的 pinned release。
## What changed / 变更
- Set only the market roster version for `jurisdiction-auditor` back to
`1.0.0`.
- Keep the pinned source ref, member commits, content hashes, governance
sidecar, and all other members unchanged.
- 仅将市场 roster 中 `jurisdiction-auditor` 的版本恢复为 `1.0.0`。
- pinned source ref、成员 commit、content hash、治理 sidecar 与其他成员均保持不变。
## Validation / 验证
- `uv run scripts/catalog/validate_catalog_metadata.py --json` — 0
errors, 129 existing warnings
- `uv run scripts/catalog/test_validate_catalog_metadata.py` — 47 passed
- `uv run scripts/catalog/test_collection_generator.py` — 4 passed
- `uv run scripts/i18n/validate-i18n.py` — 0 errors, existing warnings
only
- public-tree sensitive-pattern scan — zero matches
## Why
The team source lock declares `jurisdiction-auditor` at version `1.2.0`,
while the market roster still said `1.0.0`. DesireCore correctly
rejected the install because market member versions must match the
pinned team release.
## What changed
- update the market roster entry for `jurisdiction-auditor` to `1.2.0`;
- leave the pinned team source, commit, governance evidence, and all
other members unchanged.
## Validation
- `uv run scripts/catalog/validate_catalog_metadata.py --json` — 0
errors, 129 existing warnings
- public-tree sensitive-pattern scan — zero matches
## Why
The published pointer advertises client version `10.0.137`, while the
current DesireCore release is `10.0.136`. The newcomer instance
therefore correctly blocks installation even though the team source is
compatible with the current client.
## What changed
- align the team pointer's `requiredClientVersion` with the current
client version;
- align the catalog sidecar's compatibility declaration with the same
version.
No source pointer, team member, capability, privacy, or governance claim
changed.
## Validation
- `uv run scripts/catalog/validate_catalog_metadata.py --json` — 0
errors, 129 existing warnings
- `uv run scripts/catalog/test_validate_catalog_metadata.py` — 47 passed
- `uv run scripts/catalog/test_collection_generator.py` — 4 passed
- public-tree sensitive-pattern scan — zero matches
## Why
The contract review team already has a reproducible public Git source,
but its market pointer is still listing-only and uses the legacy
display-only shape. The current DesireCore client contract requires
explicit members, capabilities, privacy, an immutable source ref, and
installability evidence.
## What changed
- publish the contract review team as an installable,
source-pointer-only team entry;
- add the six-member roster, capability boundaries, privacy notice, and
update date;
- record review and license evidence in the catalog sidecar;
- keep the legacy team-entry schema branch while adding the current
client contract, so existing public pointers remain valid during
migration.
The source remains a public HTTPS Git pointer locked to commit
`73cd87a9901cc548871927e9d5dbec8e4cc6c2b1`. The team output is
supporting review material, not legal advice, and still requires
qualified human review.
## Validation
- `uv run scripts/catalog/validate_catalog_metadata.py --json` — 0
errors, 129 existing warnings
- `uv run scripts/catalog/test_validate_catalog_metadata.py` — 47 passed
- `uv run scripts/catalog/test_collection_generator.py` — 4 passed
- `uv run scripts/i18n/validate-i18n.py` — no errors; existing catalog
freshness warnings remain
- public-tree sensitive-pattern scan — zero matches
